Thursday, January 18, 2007

DCU Special District Finance Zone

I am getting kind of confused by the financing on this but the two recent articles in the Telegram that I have read the past week but here is what I come up with. This is not a a TIF or DIF, but something completely new created during Governor Romney's last days in office, the DCU Special District Finance Zone. It is a fixed geographic area consisting of four parcels: the Hilton Garden Inn, the Residence Inn by Marriott on Plantation Street, the DCU Center arena and convention center and the Major Taylor Boulevard parking garage, including its retail space and operations.

The bill authorizes the City of Worcester to borrow up to $30 million to finance the construction of the “sky bridge” and upgrades to the DCU Center. The initial loan order recommended by the manager initially authorizes $5.125 million in bonds to be issued for the $7 million sky bridge project. The balance ($1.875 million) of the financing for that project is already part of the city’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. How does the City of Worcester pay this back?

The special district designation allows “net new” state tax revenues, such as meals and sales taxes, collected at those establishments to be redirected to the city. The state will continue receiving existing tax revenues from establishments in the special district financing zone, but it will dedicate the "net new" revenues from that zone to the city so it can repay the loans that are taken out for the sky bridge project and improvements to the DCU Center.


Two things can happen.
  1. First the DCU Special District Finance Zone will do additional business and the "net new" state tax revenues collected will be redirected to the city, pay the notes and cost the city tax-payers nothing.
  2. Second the DCU Special District Finance Zone does no do any additional business and does not create any "net new" state tax revenues. In the later case the note would have to be paid back so I would think it would come out of the City's general fund.

All I am saying is that there is some risk here. In fact
Mr. O’Brien emphasized that the loan authorization limits any further capital improvements to proceed beyond the first allotment of $5.125 million. He said further work would be dependent upon the revenue-generating success of the DCU Special District Finance Zone. The loan authorization requires the city manager, with the assistance of the city treasurer, to report to the City Council on revenues generated by the special district, to demonstrate that they can financially support additional capital improvements beyond the first allotment.

In the end the questions is will these investments create the additional "net new" state tax revenues to pay the notes thus not cost the taxpayers of Worcester?? Reminds me of buying stock on margin. If the stock goes up, you can make some great returns. On the other hand if the stock drops, you get a margin call.




6 Comments:

At 1:09 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm thinking margin call on this one.

 
At 3:46 PM, Blogger Bill Randell said...

Truth is I am not sure which way I would go on this... Tax-payers, however, need to know that there is a risk here. From reading the headlines, it gave the impression that there was not a chance that repayment will come from the General Fund.

If there is not sufficient "net new" state revenues, repayment will in fact most definately come from the tax-payers.

 
At 4:14 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The taxpayers ALWAYS get soaked.

 
At 3:45 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I assume the city ends up owning the Skybridge or is the new Hotel a long term lessee and/or owner of the bridge?

Who maintains the bridge?

Who cleans it everyday ?

Some would assume these are dumb questions because normal logic would dictate if the city is paying for it then the city owns it. But one need only look to the $26 million theatre to which the city has "contributed" on a grand scale, yet last time I looked the property is privately owned. Can you say "Bijou Deja Vu" because that is where this theatre will also will end up.

But one never knows, given all these creative financing techniques and manuevering going on. It reminds me of the Carter administration days when mortgage rates were 16 - 17% and creative financing of homes abounded.

I see some here think we should name this structure "The Marginal Way" and I tend to agree.

Also, how is that the costs on this thing have doubled or tripled after we cut back the scope of the project? Someone help me here. How much on a percentage basis has the cost escalated since the conception of this idea?

Anyone want to buy a bridge because Worcester has been foolish enough to do just that.

Where is the DIF and TIF for my carpet bombed street?

 
At 11:01 PM, Blogger Bill Randell said...

Chris:

All I am trying to say is that if the City is going to take a loan out, betting that the "net new" state revenues will cover the payment---fine.

Reading the papers I do not think it was made clear that is what we are doing.. The headlines made it sound like there was no risk to us (the tax-payers.

..

Bill

Bill

 
At 1:09 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You're going to need a toll on this bridge before all is said and done. I have hands on experience wiht tolls.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home